[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: java.lang.Class comment bug
From: |
Brian Jones |
Subject: |
Re: java.lang.Class comment bug |
Date: |
26 Jul 2001 22:46:58 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.7 |
John Keiser <address@hidden> writes:
> On 26 Jul 2001 18:00:59 -0400, Brian Jones wrote:
> > Patrick Doyle <address@hidden> writes:
> >
> > > The comments in vm/reference/java/lang/Class.java say this:
> > >
> > > The name of an array class is <CODE>[<type name></CODE> ... for
> > > example, String[]'s class is <CODE>[java.lang.String</CODE>.
> > >
> > > According to the J2SE documentation, the name of an array class uses the
> > > name of the element type in "Java signature format". Thus, String[]'s
> > > class should be "[Ljava.lang.String;".
> > >
> > > Note that this is still not the same name as would appear in a constant
> > > pool entry, because that would use slashes instead of periods.
> >
> > I changed the javadoc entry, thanks.
> >
> > Brian
>
> Does our implementation actually do it this way? And how does Sun's
> Java behave? I remember this seeming strange to me when I wrote the
> doc.
No idea. That would be what a mauve test case is for.
Brian
--
Brian Jones <address@hidden>