[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SecurityManager troubles
From: |
Gary Benson |
Subject: |
Re: SecurityManager troubles |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:15:35 +0000 |
Jeroen Frijters wrote:
> Guilhem Lavaux wrote:
> > This block is the loop:
> >
> > at testSM$MySM.checkPermission (testSM.java:17)
> > at java.lang.SecurityManager.checkSecurityAccess
> > (SecurityManager.java:1011)
> > at java.security.Security.getProperty (Security.java:396)
> > at java.lang.SecurityManager$1.run (SecurityManager.java:1055)
> > at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged
> > (AccessController.java:96)
> > at java.lang.SecurityManager.checkPackageList
> > (SecurityManager.java:1051)
> > at java.lang.SecurityManager.checkPackageAccess
> > (SecurityManager.java:920)
> > at java.lang.ClassLoader$1.loadClass (ClassLoader.java:1108)
> > at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass (ClassLoader.java:294)
> >
> > The last loadClass is already loading java/security/Permission and
> > checkPermission needs to load java/security/Permission too. Maybe
> > it is also a SystemProperties trouble ?
>
> This still looks like a VM bug to me. java/security/Permission
> shouldn't be loaded through the application class loader, but the
> boot class loader.
Isn't the boot class loader solely for java.lang?
FWIW I was able to push IBM's JRE into an infinite loop with this
test, so it would appear to be vulnerable to the same class of
problems even if not this actual problem.
Cheers,
Gary
Test.java
Description: Text document
- Re: SecurityManager troubles, (continued)
- RE: SecurityManager troubles, Jeroen Frijters, 2006/01/12
- Re: SecurityManager troubles,
Gary Benson <=
- Re: SecurityManager troubles, Guilhem Lavaux, 2006/01/12
- Re: SecurityManager troubles, Gary Benson, 2006/01/13
- Re: SecurityManager troubles, Guilhem Lavaux, 2006/01/13
- Re: SecurityManager troubles, Dalibor Topic, 2006/01/13
- Re: SecurityManager troubles, S. Meslin-Weber, 2006/01/13
- Re: SecurityManager troubles, Christian Thalinger, 2006/01/13
RE: SecurityManager troubles, Jeroen Frijters, 2006/01/13