[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Win CE port
From: |
Roman Kennke |
Subject: |
Re: Win CE port |
Date: |
Sat, 21 Jan 2006 17:34:20 +0100 |
Hi there,
Am Freitag, den 20.01.2006, 13:05 -0800 schrieb Per Bothner:
> Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > Hi Phillipe,
> >
> > On Fri, 2006-01-20 at 15:03 +0100, Philippe Laporte wrote:
> >
> >> It is our understanding that a GPL VM can't be freely redistributed
> >>in a commercial product.
> >
> >
> > There should be no trouble at all freely redistributing such a thing in
> > a commercial product. Just make sure you distribute the source code for
> > it to your users.
>
> Just to clarify:
>
> Depends what you mean by "it". If you mean the VM, that may not be
> enough, since in an embedded environment it is likely the VM is linked
> in with the commercial product. In that case you may also have to
> freely redistributing source for the commercial product.
AFAICS this is true for the GPL, but not so with the GPL+linking
exception under which GNU Classpath is distibuted. Maybe someone with
more insight in the license (Mark? Dalibor?) could clarify this?
/Roman
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
- Win CE port, Philippe Laporte, 2006/01/19
- Re: Win CE port, Roman Kennke, 2006/01/19
- Re: Win CE port, Mark Wielaard, 2006/01/19
- Re: Win CE port, Philippe Laporte, 2006/01/20
- Re: Win CE port, Mark Wielaard, 2006/01/20
- Re: Win CE port, Per Bothner, 2006/01/20
- Re: Win CE port,
Roman Kennke <=
- Re: Win CE port, Per Bothner, 2006/01/21
- Re: Win CE port, Philippe Laporte, 2006/01/24
- Re: Win CE port, Mark Wielaard, 2006/01/24
- Re: Win CE port, Dalibor Topic, 2006/01/21