config-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] config.sub: Accept LLVM-style $cpu-$vendor-windows-cygnus


From: Dmitry V. Levin
Subject: Re: [PATCH] config.sub: Accept LLVM-style $cpu-$vendor-windows-cygnus
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 16:35:55 +0300

On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 09:59:22AM -0400, John Ericson wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2023, at 6:01 AM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> > The issue with adding new names duplicating already supported ones is that
> > every piece of software that handles the old name would have to be patched
> > eventually to handle the new name as well.
> 
> Yes, that is true. I have no good answer for that.
> 
> > Of course config.sub can provide a canonicalization of windows-cygnus into
> > cygwin if it helps.
> 
> I was worried that would close off the possibility of adding them as normal 
> forms later, but maybe it's better to just do it, if otherwise we wouldn't 
> support it at all.

I wouldn't say that would help adding them later, but that certainly
wouldn't block them either, so I suggest adding an alias as it seems
to be the best thing we can currently do.


-- 
ldv



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]