[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: copy vs link in Install
From: |
CARRY,GILLES (Non-HP-France,ex1) |
Subject: |
RE: copy vs link in Install |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Oct 2001 13:17:53 +0200 |
link in Install
>
>
> >
> > On Tue, 16 Oct 2001, CARRY,GILLES (Non-HP-France,ex1) wrote:
> >
> > > 'Install' chooses to link or copy files depending on the
> situation.
> > > Is there any way to force Cons to copy files instead of
> > linking them?
> >
> >
> > Instead of Install, define something like (untested):
> >
> > sub Copy {
> > my($env) = shift;
> > my($target) = shift;
> > for $file (@_) {
> > $env->Command($target, $file, "cp $file $target");
> > }
> > }
> >
> > And then use it as so:
> >
> > Copy $cons "include", qw( foo.h bar.h baz.h );
> >
>
> Yes I already thought of that (and made it) but this is OS-dependent.
>
> Regards.
I answer to myself:
Using Command+[perl], I can write a perl function that uses File::Copy and
then remain OS-independent.
Regards.
- copy vs link in Install, CARRY,GILLES (Non-HP-France,ex1), 2001/10/16
- RE: copy vs link in Install, CARRY,GILLES (Non-HP-France,ex1), 2001/10/16
- RE: copy vs link in Install,
CARRY,GILLES (Non-HP-France,ex1) <=