[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Hmmm.... future of cons?
From: |
vbar |
Subject: |
RE: Hmmm.... future of cons? |
Date: |
21 May 2002 16:39:08 -0000 |
address@hidden wrote:
> Although people have a lot of time and effort invested the
> only requests for _new features_ have been for parallel
Request new features is the easiest thing... :-) I still want
a Java build tool, for example - I just can't decide whether
cons is the right base for it...
Bye
Vasek
- Re: Hmmm.... future of cons?, (continued)
- Re: Hmmm.... future of cons?, Doug Alcorn, 2002/05/21
- Re: Hmmm.... future of cons?, Gary Oberbrunner, 2002/05/21
- Re: Hmmm.... future of cons?, Gary Oberbrunner, 2002/05/21
- RE: Hmmm.... future of cons?, Brad Garcia, 2002/05/21
- Re: Hmmm.... future of cons?, Rajesh Vaidheeswarran, 2002/05/23
- Re: Hmmm.... future of cons?, Doug Alcorn, 2002/05/23
- RE: Hmmm.... future of cons?, akolarik, 2002/05/21
- RE: Hmmm.... future of cons?, vbar, 2002/05/21
- RE: Hmmm.... future of cons?,
vbar <=
- RE: Hmmm.... future of cons?, Nadim Khemir, 2002/05/22
- RE: Hmmm.... future of cons?, Asko Kauppi, 2002/05/22
- RE: Hmmm.... future of cons?, akolarik, 2002/05/22