dejagnu
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Configuring dejagnu without a C++ compiler


From: Nick Clifton
Subject: Configuring dejagnu without a C++ compiler
Date: 30 Aug 2002 12:51:34 +0100

Hi Rob,

  The current dejagnu configure script uses the AC_PROG_CXX macro to
  check for a working C++ compiler.  If such a compiler is not found,
  then the configure will fail and dejagnu cannot be built.  C++
  however is not needed in order to build or run dejagnu, and it is
  only used in one test in the testsuite.

  I would like to propose a patch which provides an alternative
  definition of the AC_PROG_CXX macro which does not fail if a
  working compiler cannot be found.  It would mean that the testsuite
  (if run) would report a failed test, but this seems to be a
  reasonable compromise.

  Is this patch acceptable ?

Cheers
        Nick

2002-08-30  Nick Clifton  <address@hidden>

        * acinclude.m4: Provide alternative definition of AC_PROG_CXX
        which does not call AC_PROG_CXX_WORKS.  This allows dejagnu to
        be configured and built without a working C++ compiler.

Index: acinclude.m4
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/dejagnu/dejagnu/acinclude.m4,v
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -c -3 -p -w -r1.3 acinclude.m4
*** acinclude.m4        30 May 2001 15:35:50 -0000      1.3
--- acinclude.m4        30 Aug 2002 11:46:26 -0000
*************** fi
*** 108,110 ****
--- 108,155 ----
  
  AC_SUBST(DOCBOOK)
  ])
+ 
+ #  AC_PROG_CXX
+ 
+ # FIXME: We temporarily define our own version of AC_PROG_CXX.
+ # This is copied from autoconf 2.13, but does not call AC_PROG_CXX_WORKS.
+ # We do not need a C++ compiler in order to build dejagnu, so
+ # if we cannot find a working compiler it is not the end of
+ # the world.  This is fixed in later versions of autoconf where
+ # there is different macro which will skip the link test entirely.
+ 
+ AC_DEFUN(AC_PROG_CXX,
+ [AC_BEFORE([$0], [AC_PROG_CXXCPP])dnl
+ AC_CHECK_PROGS(CXX, $CCC c++ g++ gcc CC cxx cc++ cl, gcc)
+ 
+ AC_PROG_CXX_GNU
+ 
+ if test $ac_cv_prog_gxx = yes; then
+   GXX=yes
+ else
+   GXX=
+ fi
+ 
+ dnl Check whether -g works, even if CXXFLAGS is set, in case the package
+ dnl plays around with CXXFLAGS (such as to build both debugging and
+ dnl normal versions of a library), tasteless as that idea is.
+ ac_test_CXXFLAGS="${CXXFLAGS+set}"
+ ac_save_CXXFLAGS="$CXXFLAGS"
+ CXXFLAGS=
+ AC_PROG_CXX_G
+ if test "$ac_test_CXXFLAGS" = set; then
+   CXXFLAGS="$ac_save_CXXFLAGS"
+ elif test $ac_cv_prog_cxx_g = yes; then
+   if test "$GXX" = yes; then
+     CXXFLAGS="-g -O2"
+   else
+     CXXFLAGS="-g"
+   fi
+ else
+   if test "$GXX" = yes; then
+     CXXFLAGS="-O2"
+   else
+     CXXFLAGS=
+   fi
+ fi
+ ])






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]