[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: testsuite/*/*/*/*.exp run twice (Was: Is gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/
From: |
John David Anglin |
Subject: |
Re: testsuite/*/*/*/*.exp run twice (Was: Is gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/ieee.exp run twice in the test suite?) |
Date: |
Fri, 6 Jun 2003 13:25:03 -0400 (EDT) |
> On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 12:33:09PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
>
> > is the one reported by HJ Lu and still present in both trees. It would be
> > nice if the utils.exp bug and the other bugs were fixed in both
> > repositories while we wait for a new, official release.
>
> Well, isn't that the usual process ? :-) Subversions just let me back in
> since it processed my new key. I can now do some testing & checkin of a fix
> for this particular bug.
>
> I'd also like to get Chris's XML format change before I get too involved
> in getting a new release ready. :-)
While we are on the subject of "deja" bugs, there is a buffer truncation
problem that particularly seems to plague hppa-linux but I have also seen
if occur on i386-linux. This affects tests that produce a large amount
of output. The last part of the data received by dejagnu is truncated,
usually in the middle of a line. This might be a kernel or glibc
problem as I never see it under hpux. If anybody has any clues as to
the fix, let me know.
Dave
--
J. David Anglin address@hidden
National Research Council of Canada (613) 990-0752 (FAX: 952-6602)
- Re: testsuite/*/*/*/*.exp run twice (Was: Is gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/ieee.exp run twice in the test suite?), (continued)
Re: testsuite/*/*/*/*.exp run twice (Was: Is gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/ieee.exp run twice in the test suite?), Rob Savoye, 2003/06/06
Re: testsuite/*/*/*/*.exp run twice (Was: Is gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/ieee.exp run twice in the test suite?), David Edelsohn, 2003/06/06
Re: testsuite/*/*/*/*.exp run twice (Was: Is gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/ieee.exp run twice in the test suite?), Rob Savoye, 2003/06/06
Re: testsuite/*/*/*/*.exp run twice (Was: Is gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/ieee.exp run twice in the test suite?),
John David Anglin <=
Re: testsuite/*/*/*/*.exp run twice (Was: Is gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/ieee.exp run twice in the test suite?), H. J. Lu, 2003/06/06
Re: testsuite/*/*/*/*.exp run twice (Was: Is gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/ieee.exp run twice in the test suite?), Rob Savoye, 2003/06/06
Re: testsuite/*/*/*/*.exp run twice (Was: Is gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/ieee.exp run twice in the test suite?), Rob Savoye, 2003/06/06
Re: testsuite/*/*/*/*.exp run twice (Was: Is gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/ieee.exp run twice in the test suite?), Ben Elliston, 2003/06/07
Re: testsuite/*/*/*/*.exp run twice (Was: Is gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/ieee.exp run twice in the test suite?), John David Anglin, 2003/06/06
Re: testsuite/*/*/*/*.exp run twice (Was: Is gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/ieee.exp run twice in the test suite?), Rob Savoye, 2003/06/06
Re: expect buffer overruns (was: testsuite/*/*/*/*.exp run twice), Joern Rennecke, 2003/06/06
Re: testsuite/*/*/*/*.exp run twice (Was: Is gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/ieee.exp run twice in the test suite?), Rob Savoye, 2003/06/06