Re: Master sources?

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 05:42:17PM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> >>Who uses the repository at sources.redhat.com, and why?
> >
> >Everyone who tests combined trees from sources.
> 
> Oh, so that's the tree used by the gcc developers?
> http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/ does seem to have gcc, glibc, 
> and dejagnu.
> 
> I am in the process of writing a script to build gcc/glibc toolchains
> from source and run their regression tests.
> Originally I had thought I could use the most recent release of dejagnu,
> but recent messages on this list convinced me I'd at least need to
> include a few patches.  Now I'm not sure which cvs repository to pull
> patches from.
> 
> Which cvs repository is authoritative for gcc / glibc / dejagnu?
> And which cvs repository should I pull them from if I want to test them 
> together?
> I would have thought the answers to those two questions would be the same,
> but perhaps they aren't?

Glibc is 100% separate.  It can't be built in a combined tree like
everything else.

I find that dejagnu 1.4.3 works well enough for my purposes, so that's
what I usually use, and report any problems to Rob.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer