dejagnu
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Headsup: HEAD of dejagnu (correctly) less warnings, marks unresolved tes


From: Hans-Peter Nilsson
Subject: Headsup: HEAD of dejagnu (correctly) less warnings, marks unresolved test-cases
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:49:28 +0100

In my gcc autotester, I check cris-elf using cris-sim (all
sources are in gcc and src trees) on a Fedora 8 amd64.

I'm also using amd64 Debian machines in the gcc build farm, but
not for autotesting.  That setup doesn't reveal that many
differences (more later), because I mentioned, Debian tracks
dejagnu closer.

This isn't IMHO a real a difference in test-results, but maybe
it's cause for questions (excerpt of diff between log files):

@@ -20295,9 +20231,9 @@ Schedule of variations:
     cris-sim
 
 Running target cris-sim
-Using ~/dejagnuboards/cris-sim.exp as board description file for target.
-Using /usr/share/dejagnu/config/sim.exp as generic interface file for target.
-Using /usr/share/dejagnu/baseboards/basic-sim.exp as board description file 
for target.
+Using /tmp/hptstdgp/share/dejagnu/baseboards/cris-sim.exp as board description 
file for target.
+Using /tmp/hptstdgp/share/dejagnu/config/sim.exp as generic interface file for 
target.
+Using /tmp/hptstdgp/share/dejagnu/baseboards/basic-sim.exp as board 
description file for target.
 Using /tmp/hpautotest-gcc1/gcc/gcc/testsuite/config/default.exp as 
tool-and-target-specific interface file.
 Running /tmp/hpautotest-gcc1/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/dg.exp ...
 FAIL: gfortran.dg/PR19872.f  -O0  execution test
@@ -20333,53 +20269,29 @@ FAIL: gfortran.dg/backspace_9.f  -O3 -fo
 FAIL: gfortran.dg/backspace_9.f  -O3 -g  execution test
 FAIL: gfortran.dg/backspace_9.f  -Os  execution test
 FAIL: gfortran.dg/chmod_1.f90  -O0  (test for excess errors)
-WARNING: gfortran.dg/chmod_1.f90  -O0  compilation failed to produce executable
 FAIL: gfortran.dg/chmod_1.f90  -O1  (test for excess errors)
-WARNING: gfortran.dg/chmod_1.f90  -O1  compilation failed to produce executable
 FAIL: gfortran.dg/chmod_1.f90  -O2  (test for excess errors)
... more similar "loss" of warnings.

and

@@ -20975,6 +20863,7 @@ FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/s
 # of expected passes           22966
 # of unexpected failures       233
 # of expected failures         1
+# of unresolved testcases      48
 # of unsupported tests         116
 /tmp/hpautotest-gcc1/cris-elf/gccobj/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../gfortran  
version 4.3.0 20080212 (experimental) [trunk revision 132266] (GCC) 

The "excess errors" are ld error undefined-reference messages
due to missing functions.  (The test should probably be skipped
as unsupported.)

The gfortran.dg/chmod_1.f90 testcase is marked:

! { dg-do run }
! { dg-options "-std=gnu" }

so I think the difference is an improvement: the "run" part is
now properly marked as "unresolved" and doesn't cause spurious
warnings when the test-case doesn't link.  All good.

brgds, H-P




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]