[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Curious "buffer_full" line within host_execute
From: |
Ben Elliston |
Subject: |
Re: Curious "buffer_full" line within host_execute |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Oct 2014 17:51:08 +1100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 08:03:45AM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> Hacking in a "-d" into runtest's invocation of expect, I see this in the
> log (the 1st time through):
>
> expect: does "" (spawn_id exp0) match glob pattern "buffer_full"? no
>
> i.e. it does indeed treat "buffer_full" as a glob pattern, rather than a
> keyword.
That's good to know, thanks.
How about just removing that line altogether? I'm not sure why
DejaGnu should be at all concerned about buffering. I would expect
(ha!) Expect to be handling all of that (and the process(es) under its
control).
Cheers, Ben
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Curious "buffer_full" line within host_execute, David Malcolm, 2014/10/09
- Message not available
- Re: Curious "buffer_full" line within host_execute, David Malcolm, 2014/10/10
- Re: Curious "buffer_full" line within host_execute, David Malcolm, 2014/10/10
- Re: Curious "buffer_full" line within host_execute, David Malcolm, 2014/10/10
- Re: Curious "buffer_full" line within host_execute, David Malcolm, 2014/10/13
- Re: Curious "buffer_full" line within host_execute, Ben Elliston, 2014/10/13
- Re: Curious "buffer_full" line within host_execute, David Malcolm, 2014/10/13
- Re: Curious "buffer_full" line within host_execute, Ben Elliston, 2014/10/13
- Re: Curious "buffer_full" line within host_execute, Ben Elliston, 2014/10/14
- Re: Curious "buffer_full" line within host_execute,
Ben Elliston <=
Re: Curious "buffer_full" line within host_execute, Ben Elliston, 2014/10/12