[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Curious "buffer_full" line within host_execute
From: |
Ben Elliston |
Subject: |
Re: Curious "buffer_full" line within host_execute |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Oct 2014 16:15:08 +1100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 07:49:02PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> That seems to me like a good approach - but I'm relatively
> unfamiliar with DG, expect and tcl, so take my opinion with a
> suitably large pinch of salt :)
I have committed the following, which I think does not make things
worse:
commit 755053ffe1c4cec9b230f1972bdb6d46822e3fb6
Author: Ben Elliston <address@hidden>
Date: Tue Oct 14 13:22:23 2014 +1100
* lib/dejagnu.exp (host_execute): Remove buffer_full check. This is not
the right command keyword -- it is full_buffer. Reported by David
Malcolm <address@hidden>.
Cheers, Ben
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Curious "buffer_full" line within host_execute, David Malcolm, 2014/10/09
- Message not available
- Re: Curious "buffer_full" line within host_execute, David Malcolm, 2014/10/10
- Re: Curious "buffer_full" line within host_execute, David Malcolm, 2014/10/10
- Re: Curious "buffer_full" line within host_execute, David Malcolm, 2014/10/10
- Re: Curious "buffer_full" line within host_execute, David Malcolm, 2014/10/13
- Re: Curious "buffer_full" line within host_execute, Ben Elliston, 2014/10/13
- Re: Curious "buffer_full" line within host_execute, David Malcolm, 2014/10/13
- Re: Curious "buffer_full" line within host_execute, Ben Elliston, 2014/10/13
- Re: Curious "buffer_full" line within host_execute,
Ben Elliston <=
- Re: Curious "buffer_full" line within host_execute, Ben Elliston, 2014/10/12
Re: Curious "buffer_full" line within host_execute, Ben Elliston, 2014/10/12