Re: Rethinking remote testing

[Ben Elliston]

On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 06:19:39PM -0600, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:

> The recent and ongoing discussion over is_remote (and why is that
> the only is* predicate with an underscore in the name?) and its
> less-than-entirely-accurate implementation started me thinking about
> the topic.  What would be a better way to handle remote testing?

I wondered about that, too. I will add an isremote proc that wraps
is_remote. We can then try and depreciate is_remote over the
long-term.

Cheers, Ben

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature