[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Add riscv-sim.exp
|
From: |
Rob Savoye |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Add riscv-sim.exp |
|
Date: |
Wed, 22 Jul 2020 07:53:37 -0600 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 |
On 7/21/20 11:02 PM, Kito Cheng wrote:
> Remote protocols need a port which means it's harder to parallel
> testing in a single machine,
> but I guess it could add some mechanism to randomly pick a port to prevent
> that.
Actually that's supported for the remote protocol, it increments the
port if it's already being used.
> So currently I prefer using simple qemu wrapper or gdb sim to run gcc
> testsuite :P
GCC testing is easy, there's no protocol to worry about, and QEMU
works fine. GDB testing is much more complicated. While SIM works fine,
I think QEMU is potentially more accurate for validation.
- rob -
- [PATCH] Add riscv-sim.exp, Kito Cheng, 2020/07/14
- Re: [PATCH] Add riscv-sim.exp, Jacob Bachmeyer, 2020/07/20
- Re: [PATCH] Add riscv-sim.exp, Rob Savoye, 2020/07/20
- Re: [PATCH] Add riscv-sim.exp, Kito Cheng, 2020/07/20
- Re: [PATCH] Add riscv-sim.exp, Rob Savoye, 2020/07/20
- Re: [PATCH] Add riscv-sim.exp, Tom Tromey, 2020/07/21
- Re: [PATCH] Add riscv-sim.exp, Kito Cheng, 2020/07/22
- Re: [PATCH] Add riscv-sim.exp,
Rob Savoye <=
- Re: [PATCH] Add riscv-sim.exp, Joel Sherrill, 2020/07/22
- Re: [PATCH] Add riscv-sim.exp, Tom Tromey, 2020/07/22
- Re: [PATCH] Add riscv-sim.exp, Rob Savoye, 2020/07/23
- Re: [PATCH] Add riscv-sim.exp, Kito Cheng, 2020/07/20