[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cvs new-dir Need-Update
From: |
Sam Steingold |
Subject: |
Re: cvs new-dir Need-Update |
Date: |
20 Sep 2002 15:28:57 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
> * In message <address@hidden>
> * On the subject of "Re: cvs new-dir Need-Update "
> * Sent on Fri, 13 Sep 2002 13:56:59 -0400
> * Honorable "Stefan Monnier" <monnier+gnu/address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Hi. Not a bug report, just a question: When running cvs-examine or
> > cvs-mode-revert-buffer, I get always these "new-dirs" which are marked
> > "Need-Update", but apparently are obsolete. I can't update them. Any
> > idea what is going on?
>
> Yes, `cvs -n update' will list these as "new directory" as if `cvs
> update' would bring them in. Problem is, `cvs update' would not bring
> them in if you use the `-P' option (which is generally recommended).
>
> In other words, the problem is that `cvs -n update' ignores the `-P'
> option. It's difficult for PCL-CVS to fix it, and I couldn't find a
> trivial fix in CVS itself either (although that doesn't say much
> because I'm very non-familiar with the code).
>
> One solution is to not use the `-P' option, of course.
>
> PS: In earlier versions of PCL-CVS those messages were not turned into
> `Need-Update' but into mere informational messages. Such messages
> are less annoying in your case, but `Need-Update' is the right
> thing to do in the case of a true new directory.
> The only solution I can think of is to make it a user-option,
> which is rather a cop-out.
CVS/Entries.Log contains the list of deleted directories.
Maybe you could use it to filter out this junk altogether?
--
Sam Steingold (http://www.podval.org/~sds) running RedHat7.3 GNU/Linux
<http://www.camera.org> <http://www.iris.org.il> <http://www.memri.org/>
<http://www.mideasttruth.com/> <http://www.palestine-central.com/links.html>
The paperless office will become a reality soon after the paperless toilet.