[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in |
Date: |
Sun, 29 Sep 2002 15:53:47 -0400 |
> > Another problem: several targets (bootstrap-clean, compile-files, etc.) do
> > nested fors, and COMMAND.COM chokes on them.
>
> If you cannot work around this, perhaps we should require Bash on
> Windows 9X?
>
> > And finally a question: why is bootstrapping contingent on having a diff
> > program (and maybe also grep, I'm not sure)?
>
> What parts of the bootstrap need those programs?
And I don't see anything wrong with requiring such things.
After all, we also require TeXinfo-4.2, based on the idea that people
working from the CVS can be expected to have more tools available
(and more uptodate ones) than people using distribution tarballs.
Stefan
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, (continued)
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/09/20
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/09/22
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/09/22
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/09/24
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Stefan Monnier, 2002/09/24
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/09/25
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Stefan Monnier, 2002/09/25
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/09/30
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/09/28
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/09/29
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/09/29
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/09/29
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/09/30
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Richard Stallman, 2002/09/29