[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in |
Date: |
Mon, 30 Sep 2002 09:02:14 +0200 |
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002 10:30:16 -0400, "Stefan Monnier"
<monnier+gnu/address@hidden> wrote:
> > Would it be OK to add Local Variables sections to those .el files?
>
> Of course,
We're talking of modifying ~50 files, so I'd rather ask for confirmation before
going on.
Does anyone oppose to adding a Local Variables section with
"no-byte-compile: t" to the DONTCOMPILE files?
Thanks,
/L/e/k/t/u
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, (continued)
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/09/06
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/09/18
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/09/20
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/09/20
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/09/22
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/09/22
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/09/24
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Stefan Monnier, 2002/09/24
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/09/25
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Stefan Monnier, 2002/09/25
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/09/28
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/09/29
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Stefan Monnier, 2002/09/29
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/09/29
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/09/29
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/09/30
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Richard Stallman, 2002/09/29