Re: emacs-28 a866674b2a: Fix inaccuracies in "lax search" documentation

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com>
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 14:52:25 +0200
> 
> >>>>> On Mon, 25 Jul 2022 16:43:59 +0300, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> said:
> 
>     >> From: Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com>
>     >> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
>     >> Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes
>     >> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 15:01:38 +0200
>     >> 
>     >> Should we make `char-fold-to-regexp' into a command and refer to it
>     >> from here? Or add something like `char-fold-show-equivalences'?
> 
>     Eli> I'm not sure I understand what you have in mind, but if the intent is
>     Eli> to allow easier customization of char-fold.el, I'm for it.
> 
> I didnʼt pick up on this earlier. What do you mean by "easier
> customization of char-fold.el"? I thought the various include/exclude
> vars were all customizable already?

Yes, but the values are not very friendly for interactive
customizations, IMNSHO.

Anyway, if you didn't mean to do anything about that, I'm okay with
the status quo.