[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent)
From: |
Christopher C. Stacy |
Subject: |
Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent) |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Apr 2004 21:37:10 GMT |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
>>>>> On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 15:21:51 -0400, Barry Margolin ("Barry") writes:
Barry> In article <878ygelmtd.fsf@blp.benpfaff.org>,
Barry> Ben Pfaff <blp@cs.stanford.edu> wrote:
>> Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> writes:
>>
>> > In article <c6piil$tj1$1@blue.rahul.net>,
>> > c.c.eiftj@1-ClickXXS.usenet.us.com (Rahul Dhesi) wrote:
>> >
>> >> Most Microsoft users use "open" to mean "whatever happens after I click".
>> >
>> > I doubt anyone thinks that when they click on a link in a browser and it
>> > goes to another page or submits a form that this is "launching an
>> > application".
>>
>> Are web-based email services applications?
Barry> Possibly. But the individual operations within the email service
aren't.
Barry> BTW, rather than harping on the phrase "open the application", I'm more
Barry> concerned about "limited resource computing device". This is used in
Barry> just about every claim, but I'm not sure what it means. The
Description
Barry> refers to PDAs, and explains that the reason this method is needed is
to
Barry> make up for the lack of a keyboard
I've never seen a PDA with a mouse, though. Or, what means it, to "click"?
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), (continued)
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Barry Margolin, 2004/04/28
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Rahul Dhesi, 2004/04/28
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Barry Margolin, 2004/04/28
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Rahul Dhesi, 2004/04/28
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Barry Margolin, 2004/04/28
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Ben Pfaff, 2004/04/29
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Barry Margolin, 2004/04/29
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Rahul Dhesi, 2004/04/29
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Barry Margolin, 2004/04/29
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Rahul Dhesi, 2004/04/29
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent),
Christopher C. Stacy <=
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Barry Margolin, 2004/04/29
Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Barry Margolin, 2004/04/27
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Matt, 2004/04/28
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Philip Callan, 2004/04/28
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), John W. Eaton, 2004/04/28
1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), derelict, 2004/04/27
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Gandalf Parker, 2004/04/27
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Barry Margolin, 2004/04/28
1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), derelict, 2004/04/27
Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Jed Margolin, 2004/04/28
- Prev by Date:
Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent)
- Next by Date:
Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent)
- Previous by thread:
Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent)
- Next by thread:
Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent)
- Index(es):