[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent)
From: |
Rahul Dhesi |
Subject: |
Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent) |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Apr 2004 00:18:49 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
nn/6.6.4 |
Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> writes:
>In article <c6rlbf$si0$1@blue.rahul.net>,
> c.c.eiftj@1-ClickXXS.usenet.us.com (Rahul Dhesi) wrote:
>> But unlike me, you seemd to imply, several times, that "open" and
>> "application" had obvious common meanings -- which meanings you have yet
>> to state with any prevision.
>An application is a computer program that performs a distinct activity.
>Opening it is starting it running.
>These are common terms in the computer industry. Since a patent is
>supposed to be understandable by an industry professional, how far does
>it have to go in defining common terms?
So now you see how that patent is disastrously broad -- it covers any
activity on a device that the user wishes were more powerful, caused by
a long press, that starts a distinct computer program. If that isn't a
stupid patent, I don't know what is.
As to your comment about "common terms", did you know that "stuff" is
also a very common term?
--
Rahul
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), (continued)
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Rahul Dhesi, 2004/04/28
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Barry Margolin, 2004/04/28
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Rahul Dhesi, 2004/04/28
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Barry Margolin, 2004/04/28
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Rahul Dhesi, 2004/04/28
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Barry Margolin, 2004/04/28
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Ben Pfaff, 2004/04/29
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Barry Margolin, 2004/04/29
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Rahul Dhesi, 2004/04/29
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Barry Margolin, 2004/04/29
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent),
Rahul Dhesi <=
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Christopher C. Stacy, 2004/04/29
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Barry Margolin, 2004/04/29
Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Barry Margolin, 2004/04/27
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Matt, 2004/04/28
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Philip Callan, 2004/04/28
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), John W. Eaton, 2004/04/28
1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), derelict, 2004/04/27
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Gandalf Parker, 2004/04/27
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Barry Margolin, 2004/04/28
1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), derelict, 2004/04/27
- Prev by Date:
Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent)
- Next by Date:
Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent)
- Previous by thread:
Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent)
- Next by thread:
Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent)
- Index(es):