[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?
From: |
Stefaan A Eeckels |
Subject: |
Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ? |
Date: |
Tue, 6 Jul 2004 14:58:05 +0200 |
On 06 Jul 2004 12:48:41 +0200
David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> wrote:
> The above sentence contains 3 unmodified verbatim copies of "e".
Oh man, that serious hat must have been glued down
with superglue.
--
Stefaan
--
"What is stated clearly conceives easily." -- Inspired sales droid
- Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?, (continued)
- Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?, Brian Gough, 2004/07/05
- Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/07/05
- Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2004/07/06
- Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?, Ben Pfaff, 2004/07/06
- Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2004/07/06
- Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?, David Kastrup, 2004/07/06
- Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2004/07/06
- Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?, David Kastrup, 2004/07/06
- Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/07/06
- Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?,
Stefaan A Eeckels <=
- Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/07/06
- Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2004/07/06
- Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/07/06
- Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2004/07/06
- Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/07/06
- Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2004/07/06
- Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/07/06