Re: Use of GPL'd code with proprietary programs

[Rui Miguel Seabra]

On Sun, 2004-07-18 at 06:47 +0000, wrote:
> Rui Miguel Seabra <rms@1407.org> wrote:
> 
> > You're including them into your work. The only proof of otherwise, is
> > removing that #include and see if it all works as expected.
> 
> Why is this the only proof?

Okay, there could be other proofs, but I've yet to hear one.

> Does any case law support the use of such a test?

There isn't any case law of the opposite that I know of, so you're
pulling a strawman argument.

Rui

-- 
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?

Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part