[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?
|
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
|
Subject: |
Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL? |
|
Date: |
Mon, 19 Jul 2004 17:53:56 +0200 |
Robert Newson wrote:
[...]
> Or to put it another way, suppose SYSV was GPL'd. Then if IBM added JFS to
> that, it'd have to release the SYSV+JFS as GPL. SCO's interpretation of GPL
http://tinyurl.com/xjw8
http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3:mss:7463
regards,
alexander.
P.S. http://tinyurl.com/xles http://tinyurl.com/2xg5t
- SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, Nick Kew, 2004/07/19
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, Paul F. Johnson, 2004/07/19
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, Chris Croughton, 2004/07/19
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, Nick Kew, 2004/07/19
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, Robert Newson, 2004/07/19
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, Rui Miguel Seabra, 2004/07/19
- Message not available
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/07/19
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, Rui Miguel Seabra, 2004/07/19
- Message not available
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/07/19
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, David Kastrup, 2004/07/19
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, Rui Miguel Seabra, 2004/07/19
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, Linønut, 2004/07/19
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, Linønut, 2004/07/19
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, John Hasler, 2004/07/20
Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, John Winters, 2004/07/19