|
From: | jim.brown |
Subject: | Re: Questions on proprietary program using gcc libraries |
Date: | Mon, 19 Jul 2004 22:12:01 GMT |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02 (ax) |
I think I am now convinced that I can use libstdc++.so in my shared library using the special exception mentioned in the copyright notice. I'm less sure about libgcc_s.so but I assume this is OK also. Since we deliver a shared library, we do not in fact link our product with these libraries. The customer using our library links with it. So I think I am legal. Can anyone from the gnu organization confirm or deny this? Jim I have jim.brown wrote:
I've searched this forum and did not find any guidance. I am building a proprietary shared library with gcc. The normal C++ runtime routines (memcpy etc.) are dynamically linked. 1. Can I sell my application since it uses the C runtime. 2. If I sell it, am I correct that it falls under the LGPL license. 3. If the person who buys does not have gcc, can I distribute the C++ runtime libraries libgcc_s.so.1 libstdc++.so.5 with my product. If so, how do I reference their license? I am on Solaris 9 and RehHat Linux 9. Thanks for the help. I have been unable to interpret the LGPL by myself. Jim
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |