[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?
From: |
Linønut |
Subject: |
Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL? |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Jul 2004 21:27:00 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Outlook 5.5 (WinNT 5.0) |
User-agent: |
slrn/0.9.8.0 (Linux) |
Error BR-549: MS DRM 1.0 rejects the following post from Alexander Terekhov:
> Steve Firth wrote:
>> challenge to GPL. Several of them beleived that it would eb perfectly
>> possible to use GPL'd code and to stick two fingers up at the code
>> creator.
>
> IANALB and I also believe in this theory. FSF's expansive claims
> are barred by the doctrine of copyright misuse and the doctrine
> of first sale.
Apparently many of the parties the FSF have contacted about improper use of
GPL'ed code did not have the same blasé attitude as yourself.
--
Free as in freedom
Power as in empowerment
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/07/20
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, Rui Miguel Seabra, 2004/07/20
- Message not available
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/07/20
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2004/07/21
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/07/21
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, telford, 2004/07/21
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, John Hasler, 2004/07/21
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, telford, 2004/07/22
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, Rui Miguel Seabra, 2004/07/20
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, Chris Croughton, 2004/07/20
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?,
Linønut <=
Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, Tim Smith, 2004/07/19