Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?

[Alexander Terekhov]

Greg Hennessy wrote:
[...]
> Is Stallman *really* trying to assert that calling code using Ndiswrapper
> makes *windows* drivers derivative works & therefore GPL'd ?!?

He's claiming that it's a "violation" of the GPL. Things like "It 
can also be a violation of the GNU GPL to link the drivers into a 
proprietary kernel. To increase the temptation to do so is asking 
for trouble." See

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=40320716.E5FF569C%40web.de
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=403344E5.E7872D34%40web.de

regards,
alexander.