Re: Is Hibernate right about the LGPL?

gnu-misc-discuss

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Is Hibernate right about the LGPL?

From:	Alexander Terekhov
Subject:	Re: Is Hibernate right about the LGPL?
Date:	Thu, 26 Aug 2004 12:49:07 +0200

Lasse Reichstein Nielsen wrote:
[...]
> distribution is allowed by section 6.

Distribution is allowed by 17 USC 109. And [L]GPL is a joke.

regards,
alexander.

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

Is Hibernate right about the LGPL?, Lasse Reichstein Nielsen, 2004/08/26
- Re: Is Hibernate right about the LGPL?, Alexander Terekhov <=
  - Re: Is Hibernate right about the LGPL?, Rui Miguel Seabra, 2004/08/26
  - Message not available
    - Re: Is Hibernate right about the LGPL?, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/08/26
    - Re: Is Hibernate right about the LGPL?, Rui Miguel Seabra, 2004/08/26
    - Message not available
    - Re: Is Hibernate right about the LGPL?, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/08/27
  - Message not available
    - Re: Is Hibernate right about the LGPL?, Stefan Monnier, 2004/08/26
    - Re: Is Hibernate right about the LGPL?, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/08/27
- Re: Is Hibernate right about the LGPL?, Simon Waters, 2004/08/26
  - Re: Is Hibernate right about the LGPL?, Lasse Reichstein Nielsen, 2004/08/27

Prev by Date: Is Hibernate right about the LGPL?
Next by Date: Re: GPL'ing Solaris won't save SUN
Previous by thread: Is Hibernate right about the LGPL?
Next by thread: Re: Is Hibernate right about the LGPL?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread