[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Patents again
From: |
Abdullah Ramazanoglu |
Subject: |
Re: Patents again |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Oct 2004 21:25:17 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Pan/0.14.2.91 (As She Crawled Across the Table) |
begin threeseas <timrueAT@mindspringDOT.com> dedi ki:
> Abdullah Ramazanoglu wrote:
>
> [snip - see thread]
> you're just full of FUD.
> go ahead and prove your case. Sneak some patented code in... take down FOSS.
> but know that if you get caught, it backfires and you are held
> responsible for intentional deception, and libel for it.
Empty words, unsubstantiated confidence, reasonless claims...
Rightful concerns, expressed along with with a well detailed reasoning,
are not FUD. They're just concerns. But denying them without offering any
(counter)reason whatsoever, might well be called as Denying Unignorable
Hazards, or "DUH".
--
Abdullah | aramazan@ |
Ramazanoglu | myrealbox |
________________| D.0.T cöm |__
- Re: Patents again, (continued)
- Re: Patents again, telford, 2004/10/09
- Re: Patents again, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/10/09
- Re: Patents again, telford, 2004/10/09
- Re: Patents again, Abdullah Ramazanoglu, 2004/10/09
- Re: Patents again, threeseas, 2004/10/11
- Re: Patents again, Abdullah Ramazanoglu, 2004/10/12
- Re: Patents again, threeseas, 2004/10/12
- Re: Patents again,
Abdullah Ramazanoglu <=
- Re: Patents again, threeseas, 2004/10/14
- Re: Patents again, Paul Jarc, 2004/10/13
- Message not available
- Re: Patents again, threeseas, 2004/10/13
- Message not available
- Re: Patents again, Abdullah Ramazanoglu, 2004/10/15
- Message not available
- Re: Patents again, Abdullah Ramazanoglu, 2004/10/15
- Re: Patents again, threeseas, 2004/10/15
- Re: Patents again, Abdullah Ramazanoglu, 2004/10/15
- Re: Patents again, threeseas, 2004/10/19
Re: Patents again, Paul Barker, 2004/10/17