Re: "Adobe Open Source License" GPL compatible?

[Rui Miguel Seabra]

On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 10:57 +0200, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> First sale aside for a moment, GPL is a bare copyright license. When
> you merely "combine" works, you create compilations, not derivative
> works. The former is also known as "mere aggregation." Got it now?

Well, apart from the fact that there is no "combining" but combining,
one should take in account that while in combining you are just
combining, when you build upon an existing work (aka use a library)
you're making a derivate.

Rui

-- 
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?

Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part