[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: why is non-free software immoral?
From: |
Thien-Thi Nguyen |
Subject: |
Re: why is non-free software immoral? |
Date: |
Tue, 04 Oct 2005 17:06:51 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Zen Lunatic <lunaticster@gmail.com> writes:
> I'm wondering what your reason is for why non-free software is
> immoral? Think of this more as a survey than a debate. Thanks.
if you think of immoral as negative, non-free software is immoral
because a fettered mind is a gift from the slave to the slaveowner.
if you think of immoral as neutral (similar to "amoral"), non-free
software is immoral because as a currency in motion it casts no
shadow on the moral axis.
if you think of immoral as positive, non-free software is immoral
because slaveowners know better than to let slaves live unprotected.
if you don't think of immoral as correlatable w/ non-free software
in any sense, then you probably have stopped reading by now, which
is just as well...
thi
Re: why is non-free software immoral?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/10/05
- Re: why is non-free software immoral?,
Thien-Thi Nguyen <=
- Message not available