[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL and other licences
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: GPL and other licences |
Date: |
Wed, 01 Feb 2006 11:43:39 +0100 |
Barry Margolin wrote:
[...]
> But that's not really a good analogy. Combining two programs is not
> just making references, you actually merge parts of one program into a
> copy of the other.
What do you mean by "merge". They remain as two separate computer
programs (or parts thereof, if you like) under copyright law. No
protected expression was transformed/modified forming a derivative
work. Combined executable is just an aggregation of many computer
program works under copyright law. If you insist I can supply you
with maps that will allow you to extract all those distinct
components.
regards,
alexander.
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alan Mackenzie, 2006/02/01
- Re: GPL and other licences,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: GPL and other licences, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/02/01
- Re: GPL and other licences, Barry Margolin, 2006/02/02
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/02
- Re: GPL and other licences, Barry Margolin, 2006/02/02
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/03
- Re: GPL and other licences, Lasse Reichstein Nielsen, 2006/02/03
- Message not available
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/03
- Re: GPL and other licences, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/02/03
- Message not available
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/03
- Re: GPL and other licences, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/02/04