[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL and other licences
From: |
Stefaan A Eeckels |
Subject: |
Re: GPL and other licences |
Date: |
Thu, 2 Feb 2006 21:15:07 +0100 |
On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 11:50:13 +0100
"Alfred M\. Szmidt" <ams@gnu.org> wrote:
> The point isn't about caring or not caring, many people license things
> under the GPL and don't care if the work is used in non-free programs.
> It is still a license violation; only that nobody knows about it or
> can prove that it happend.
In which case the law doesn't consider itself competent to intervene.
Absence of proof means innocence. What you are talking about is
morality, not legality.
Take care,
--
Stefaan
--
As complexity rises, precise statements lose meaning,
and meaningful statements lose precision. -- Lotfi Zadeh
Re: GPL and other licences, Isaac, 2006/02/01
Message not availableRe: GPL and other licences, Isaac, 2006/02/02
Re: GPL and other licences, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/02/02