Re: GPL and other licences

[Rui Miguel Silva Seabra]

On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 17:46 +0100, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
> [...]
> > The thing is that the copyright licenses of software like Microsoft
> > explicitly say you have to have one license per computer. Now... if they
> > were only stating copyright law, would they have to do that?
> 
> What they are stating is this: (MS EULA)
> 
> ----
>     * Installation and use.  You may install, use, access,
>       display and run one copy of the Product on a single
>       computer, 

yawn. You're boring. You try to say !a showcasing a.

> BTW, given the set-in-stone FSF's stance on legal status of the 
> GPL (everybody and his dog knows for certain that the GPL is a 
> unilateral-permission-not-a-contract) I have no idea what 
> contract the FSF hired lawyers in Indian are talking about. 
> 
> Hey mini-RMS, what do you think? C'mon share your thoughts on 
> that.

I don't think anything since I don't know not of what you're speaking.
But the anecdotal evidence portrayed by your posts leave you very little
credit as far as saying a truthful thing goes.

Rui

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part