[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Intellectual Property II
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Intellectual Property II |
Date: |
Sat, 11 Feb 2006 23:03:02 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
> David Kastrup wrote:
> [...]
>> > What breach? Distribution of authorized copies fall under first
>> > sale.
>>
>> Sure, but there has been no unconditional authorization. So we are
>> talking about distribution of unauthorized copies.
>
> The act of distribution doesn't turn authorized copies into
> unauthorized copies. The act of distribution is totally irrelevant
> RE determination whether a copy is authorized or not. So once again,
> what breach?
Conditional authorization does not magically turn into unconditional
authorization.
It's one of your favorite mistakes.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: Intellectual Property II, (continued)
- Re: Intellectual Property II, David Kastrup, 2006/02/11
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/11
- Re: Intellectual Property II, David Kastrup, 2006/02/11
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/11
- Re: Intellectual Property II, David Kastrup, 2006/02/11
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/11
- Re: Intellectual Property II, David Kastrup, 2006/02/11
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/11
- Re: Intellectual Property II,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Isaac, 2006/02/11
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/11
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Isaac, 2006/02/12
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/11
- Re: Intellectual Property II, David Kastrup, 2006/02/11
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/11
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alan Mackenzie, 2006/02/12
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/12
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/16
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/16