[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Intellectual Property II
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: Intellectual Property II |
Date: |
Sat, 11 Feb 2006 23:24:43 +0100 |
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
> Conditional authorization does not magically turn into unconditional
> authorization.
A promise on my part to forbear from distribution right under first
sale and instead do what you decree is a covenant, not a condition.
And it has really nothing to do with copyright. Breach of contract
is the only nonfrivolous claim you can make (provided that I have
fulfilled the real conditions and created authorized copies).
-----
Adobe asserts that its license defines the relationship between
Adobe and any third-party such that a breach of the license
constitutes copyright infringement. This assertion is not accurate
because copyright law in fact provides certain rights to owners of
a particular copy. This grant of rights is independent from any
purported grant of rights from Adobe. The Adobe license compels
third-parties to relinquish rights that the third-parties enjoy
under copyright law.
-----
s/Adobe/FSF
regards,
alexander.
- Re: Intellectual Property II, (continued)
- Re: Intellectual Property II, David Kastrup, 2006/02/11
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/11
- Re: Intellectual Property II, David Kastrup, 2006/02/11
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/11
- Re: Intellectual Property II, David Kastrup, 2006/02/11
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/11
- Re: Intellectual Property II, David Kastrup, 2006/02/11
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Isaac, 2006/02/11
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/11
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Isaac, 2006/02/12
- Re: Intellectual Property II,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: Intellectual Property II, David Kastrup, 2006/02/11
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/11
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alan Mackenzie, 2006/02/12
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/12
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/16
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/16
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/16
- Re: Property according to Terekov, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/02/12
- Message not available
- Re: First sale according to COPYRIGHT LAW, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/13
- Re: First sale according to Terekov, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/02/13