[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL and other licences
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: GPL and other licences |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Feb 2006 21:18:53 +0100 |
> You do not have to be the owner of the copy in order to exercise
> the rights given in the GPL.
If you are not the owner of the copy, the license --whatever it
might be-- doesn't enter into it at all.
The license does _not_ apply to the physical copy, it applies to the
software. Please read the license, it even says so
- Re: GPL and other licences, (continued)
- Re: GPL and other licences, Lasse Reichstein Nielsen, 2006/02/14
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/02/14
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/02/13
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/02/12
- Re: GPL and other licences, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/02/12
- Re: GPL and other licences, John Hasler, 2006/02/12
- Re: GPL and other licences,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Message not available
- Re: GPL and other licences, David Kastrup, 2006/02/13
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/02/13
- Re: GPL and other licences, David Kastrup, 2006/02/13
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/02/13
- Re: GPL and other licences, David Kastrup, 2006/02/13
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/02/14
- Re: GPL and other licences, David Kastrup, 2006/02/14
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/02/14
- Message not available
- Re: GPL and other licences, Graham Murray, 2006/02/14
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/14