[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL and other licences
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: GPL and other licences |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:00:34 +0100 |
Stefaan A Eeckels wrote:
[...]
> Of course they could be covered by the GPL if they were under the BSDL
> and are now re-licensed under the GPL. Hint: read up on licenses that
> are compatible with the GPL.
Hey Commando, BSDL doesn't allow relicensing under the GPL. It doesn't
have LGPL like clause that allows it. And reading up "on licenses that
are compatible with the GPL" (typical FSF's bullshiting) doesn't really
change that fact.
regards,
alexander.
- Re: GPL and other licences, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: GPL and other licences, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/02/13
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/02/13
- Message not available
- Re: GPL and other licences, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/02/13
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/02/13
- Message not available
- Re: GPL and other licences, David Kastrup, 2006/02/13
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/02/14
- Message not available
- Re: GPL and other licences, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/02/14
- Re: GPL and other licences,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/02/14
- Message not available
- Re: GPL and other licences, David Kastrup, 2006/02/14
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/14
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/02/14
- Message not available
- Re: GPL and other licences, David Kastrup, 2006/02/14
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/15
- Re: GPL and other licences, David Kastrup, 2006/02/15
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/15
- Re: GPL and other licences, David Kastrup, 2006/02/15
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/15