[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Eben was absent that day in law school
|
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
|
Subject: |
Re: Eben was absent that day in law school |
|
Date: |
Wed, 22 Feb 2006 16:07:09 +0100 |
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
>
> Barnes & Thornburg LLP on price:
>
> -------
> Plaintiff's argument that an agreement to license any derivative works
Uhmm.
Wallace's argument was about collective works to begin with.
-----
Alternative Vertical Analysis
In the alternative, if the GPL license is viewed simply as distributing
a collective work in a vertical agreement ...
-----
Somehow it got translated by Barnes & Thornburg LLP to
"Plaintiff's argument that an agreement to license any derivative works"
Any ideas? Hey dak?
regards,
alexander.
- Eben was absent that day in law school, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/16
- Re: Eben was absent that day in law school, Isaac, 2006/02/18
- Re: Eben was absent that day in law school, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/22
- Re: Eben was absent that day in law school, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/22
- Re: Eben was absent that day in law school, David Kastrup, 2006/02/22
- Re: Eben was absent that day in law school, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/22
- Re: Eben was absent that day in law school, David Kastrup, 2006/02/22
- Re: Eben was absent that day in law school, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/22
- Re: Eben was absent that day in law school,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: Eben was absent that day in law school, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/22
- Re: Eben was absent that day in law school, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/22
- Re: Eben was absent that day in law school, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/22
- Re: Eben was absent that day in law school, David Kastrup, 2006/02/22
- Re: Eben was absent that day in law school, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/22
- Re: Eben was absent that day in law school, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/02/23
- Message not available
- Re: Eben was absent that day in law school, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/24