[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Eben was absent that day in law school
|
From: |
David Kastrup |
|
Subject: |
Re: Eben was absent that day in law school |
|
Date: |
Wed, 22 Feb 2006 15:12:41 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
> David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>> Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
>>
>> > Barnes & Thornburg LLP on price:
>> >
>> > -------
>> > Plaintiff's argument [...] is untenable [...]
>> >
>> > He he.
>>
>> You are hopping with glee because a commentary butchers the theories
>> of your personal hero?
>>
>> Well, Wallace certainly provides you with fun, it appears.
>
> Hey dak, do you know where can I find negativily priced GPL'd stuff?
You better start looking, since Wallace's line of argument implies
just that. Which is why it is untenable.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Eben was absent that day in law school, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/16
- Re: Eben was absent that day in law school, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/22
- Re: Eben was absent that day in law school, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/22
- Re: Eben was absent that day in law school, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/22
- Re: Eben was absent that day in law school, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/22
- Re: Eben was absent that day in law school, David Kastrup, 2006/02/22
- Re: Eben was absent that day in law school, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/22
- Re: Eben was absent that day in law school, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/02/23
- Message not available
- Re: Eben was absent that day in law school, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/24