[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Can LGPL be used for non-libraries
|
From: |
John Hasler |
|
Subject: |
Re: Can LGPL be used for non-libraries |
|
Date: |
Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:34:35 -0600 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Daniel Qarras writes:
> I notice that, e.g., Linux distributions (including Debian, Red Hat, and
> SuSE) are shipping slightly modified/patched versions of OOo as part of
> their distributions but they claim the license is LGPL. But since, e
Because only the copyright owners can forbid it, and they have obviously
granted an implied license.
--
John Hasler
john@dhh.gt.org
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI USA
- Can LGPL be used for non-libraries, Daniel Qarras, 2006/02/28
- Re: Can LGPL be used for non-libraries, John Hasler, 2006/02/28
- Re: Can LGPL be used for non-libraries, Daniel Qarras, 2006/02/28
- Re: Can LGPL be used for non-libraries, Isaac, 2006/02/28
- Re: Can LGPL be used for non-libraries, Merijn de Weerd, 2006/02/28
- Re: Can LGPL be used for non-libraries, Isaac, 2006/02/28
- Re: Can LGPL be used for non-libraries, Daniel Qarras, 2006/02/28
- Re: Can LGPL be used for non-libraries,
John Hasler <=
- Re: Can LGPL be used for non-libraries, Isaac, 2006/02/28
- Re: Can LGPL be used for non-libraries, Daniel Qarras, 2006/02/28
- Re: Can LGPL be used for non-libraries, Isaac, 2006/02/28