[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine
|
From: |
Linønut |
|
Subject: |
Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine |
|
Date: |
Tue, 21 Mar 2006 16:54:01 -0600 |
|
User-agent: |
slrn/0.9.8.1 (Linux) |
After takin' a swig o' grog, karl@tug.org belched out this bit o' wisdom:
> (I am posting this on behalf of Richard Stallman, rms@gnu.org, at his
> request. The "I" below is rms.)
Sure it is.
And I'm Tony Blair.
--
Q: Why does a GNU/Linux user compile his kernel?
A: Because he can.
Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine, Rick, 2006/03/07
Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine, Alan Mackenzie, 2006/03/09
Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine, karl, 2006/03/21
- Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine,
Linønut <=
- Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine, Tim Smith, 2006/03/21
- Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine, Tim Smith, 2006/03/21
- Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine, Linønut, 2006/03/22
- Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine, David Kastrup, 2006/03/27
- Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine, Linønut, 2006/03/22
Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine, Linønut, 2006/03/22
Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine, Alan Mackenzie, 2006/03/22
Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine, David Kastrup, 2006/03/22
Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine, Alan Mackenzie, 2006/03/22
Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine, David Kastrup, 2006/03/22