[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;) |
Date: |
Sat, 25 Mar 2006 23:38:42 +0100 |
"Alfred M. Szmidt" wrote:
[...]
> "You must cause any work that you distribute or publish", since the
> work hasn't been distributed to you yet, so I am quite free to charge
> you a bazillion zorkmoids to actually distribute it to you, Section 1:
> "You may charge a fee for the physical act of transferring a copy, and
> you may at your option offer warranty protection in exchange for a
> fee.".
And Wallace said that "the defendants attempt to conflate...".
But given that you just can't grok the concept of "intellectual
property" (being a property/bundle of rights which just like
ownership rights to material objects in which work is fixed can
also be sold/licensed (but not under 17 USC 109 which covers the
right to distribute lawfully made material objects in which work
is fixed), don't bother to reply.
regards,
alexander.
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), (continued)
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), David Kastrup, 2006/03/24
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/03/25
- Message not available
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/03/25
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), David Kastrup, 2006/03/25
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/03/25
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), David Kastrup, 2006/03/25
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/03/25
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), David Kastrup, 2006/03/25
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/03/25
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/03/25
- Message not available
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;),
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/03/25
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), John Hasler, 2006/03/27
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/03/27
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Graham Murray, 2006/03/26
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/03/27
- GPLv3 comedy unfolding, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/03/29
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/03/26
- Message not available
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), David Kastrup, 2006/03/26
- Message not available
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/03/27
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alan Mackenzie, 2006/03/27