[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: relicensing from MIT to LGPL
|
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
|
Subject: |
Re: relicensing from MIT to LGPL |
|
Date: |
Thu, 11 May 2006 22:40:49 +0200 |
jmg3000@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
> What steps must I follow to re-release it, with my changes and
> additions, under the LGPL?
Your "changes and additions" can be licensed under whatever you want
as long as they don't contain ("substantial portions" of) protected
expression from the MIT'd work. You may NOT replace the MIT license
with the LGPL.
regards,
alexander.
- relicensing from MIT to LGPL, jmg3000, 2006/05/11
- Re: relicensing from MIT to LGPL,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: relicensing from MIT to LGPL, jmg3000, 2006/05/11
- Re: relicensing from MIT to LGPL, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/05/11
- Re: relicensing from MIT to LGPL, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/05/11
- Re: relicensing from MIT to LGPL, jmg3000, 2006/05/11
- Re: relicensing from MIT to LGPL, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/05/12
- Message not available
- Re: relicensing from MIT to LGPL, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/05/12
- Re: relicensing from MIT to LGPL, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/05/12
- Message not available
- Re: relicensing from MIT to LGPL, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/05/12
- Re: relicensing from MIT to LGPL, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/05/12
- Message not available
- Re: relicensing from MIT to LGPL, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/05/12