Re: relicensing from MIT to LGPL

[jmg3000]

> You may NOT replace the MIT license
> with the LGPL.

Hm. I'm confused. The MIT license
(http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php) on the one hand
says you may "sublicense" (re-license?) the code, but OTOH says,
"[snip] this permission notice shall be included in all copies or
substantial portions of the Software."

So, if you must include that "permission notice", does that mean the
code must by definition be licensed under those terms (i.e. the MIT
license)?