[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: relicensing from MIT to LGPL
From: |
jmg3000 |
Subject: |
Re: relicensing from MIT to LGPL |
Date: |
11 May 2006 18:48:15 -0700 |
User-agent: |
G2/0.2 |
> Sublicense doesn't mean "relicense" under the any terms
> you like. It just means that you, as a licensee, got the
> permission to enter into a contract with other parties
> [snip] conveying rights reserved to copyright owner(s)
> under the terms of the MIT license.
Ohhhhhh. I see now. Thank you for the clarification!
- relicensing from MIT to LGPL, jmg3000, 2006/05/11
- Re: relicensing from MIT to LGPL, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/05/11
- Re: relicensing from MIT to LGPL, jmg3000, 2006/05/11
- Re: relicensing from MIT to LGPL, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/05/11
- Re: relicensing from MIT to LGPL, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/05/11
- Re: relicensing from MIT to LGPL,
jmg3000 <=
- Re: relicensing from MIT to LGPL, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/05/12
- Message not available
- Re: relicensing from MIT to LGPL, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/05/12
- Re: relicensing from MIT to LGPL, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/05/12
- Message not available
- Re: relicensing from MIT to LGPL, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/05/12
- Re: relicensing from MIT to LGPL, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/05/12
- Message not available
- Re: relicensing from MIT to LGPL, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/05/12
- Message not available
- Re: relicensing from MIT to LGPL, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/05/12
- Re: relicensing from MIT to LGPL, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/05/12
- Message not available
- Re: relicensing from MIT to LGPL, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/05/12
- Re: relicensing from MIT to LGPL, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/05/12