Re: relicensing from MIT to LGPL

[Rui Miguel Silva Seabra]

Sex, 2006-05-12 às 17:23 +0200, Alexander Terekhov escreveu:
> The FSF didn't dispute that the GPL is a contract. The FSF even told the 
> court that "the contract controls".

That's still not the FSF but a document referenced in favour of Wallace.

> ***) http://www.terekhov.de/Wallace_v_Red_Hat_2nd_ANSWER.pdf (this case is
> still pending)

(...) bunch of something that's not said by the FSF and doesn't even
mention "contract" (...)

Rui

signature.asc
Description: Esta é uma parte de mensagem assinada digitalmente