Re: GPL and inhouse use?

[Merijn de Weerd]

On 2006-05-16, Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> wrote:
> Merijn de Weerd wrote:
>> was just saying that that should change: also in-house code
>> should be shared, once it's out of testing.
>
> That would be at odds with copyright law (which the GPL blatantly
> misstates by saying that "nothing else grants you permission to 
> modify or distribute"), dear law student.

Don't patronize, dear Alex.

As I said to David, I was talking about code that offers
a service to the public. In other words, a public performance
of the work.

By the way, do you have some sort of compulsion to add
a random quote from 17 USC to anything you post?

Merijn

-- 
Remove +nospam to reply