[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL and inhouse use?
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: GPL and inhouse use? |
Date: |
Thu, 18 May 2006 12:49:48 +0200 (CEST) |
In case you haven't noticed, RMS does not participate in public
discussion groups.
I guess that means that emacs-devel, the GNOME lists, debian-legal,
the Linux kernel mailing list, etc aren't public discussion group.
Your hero worship makes you appear like a complete and utter idiot,
and it does not help the case of who you imagine to be supporting.
It is you who brought this up, you are subscribed to emacs-devel, go
bitch at RMS there for being unable to `properly attribute articles'.
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, (continued)
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/05/17
- Message not available
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, David Kastrup, 2006/05/17
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/05/17
- Message not available
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, David Kastrup, 2006/05/17
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/05/18
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, David Kastrup, 2006/05/18
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/05/18
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, David Kastrup, 2006/05/18
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/05/18
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, David Kastrup, 2006/05/18
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Message not available
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/05/18
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Merijn de Weerd, 2006/05/17
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Miles Bader, 2006/05/16
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Byron A Jeff, 2006/05/18
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, John Hasler, 2006/05/14