[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Circumventing the GPL ...
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: Circumventing the GPL ... |
Date: |
Tue, 30 May 2006 17:51:08 +0200 |
Nick Kew wrote:
>
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/05/30/nokia_goes_open_source/
>
> Nokia is to open its browser engine under a BSD license.
>
> The browser engine is developed with apple and based on Safari.
> Which is in turn based on khtml/konqueror. Which is KDE,
> which is GPL. So that's a derivative of GPL software appearing
> under a BSD license, or so it would appear.
>
> Now, presumably Apple negotiated non-GPL terms with the KDE folks
> for their use of the code in Safari. Did those terms include
> permission to open-source a derived product under non-GPL terms?
> If so, it would appear to have effectively killed copyleft on
> this particular software.
<chuckles>
Read up something on the AFC test. And kindly piss off with your
GNUish/SCOish "based on" derivative theories in the meantime.
regards,
alexander.
- Circumventing the GPL ..., Nick Kew, 2006/05/30
- Re: Circumventing the GPL ..., Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/05/30
- Re: Circumventing the GPL ...,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: Circumventing the GPL ..., Unruh, 2006/05/30
- Re: Circumventing the GPL ..., Alexander Terekhov, 2006/05/30
- Re: Circumventing the GPL ..., Unruh, 2006/05/30
- Re: Circumventing the GPL ..., Alexander Terekhov, 2006/05/30
- Re: Circumventing the GPL ..., Unruh, 2006/05/30
- Re: Circumventing the GPL ..., Alexander Terekhov, 2006/05/30
- Re: Circumventing the GPL ..., Unruh, 2006/05/30