Re: license issue: calling a GPLv2 library

[Alexander Terekhov]

David Kastrup wrote:
> 
> Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
> 
> > David Kastrup wrote:
> > [...]
> >> It appears that I am _already_ pissing you off.  Anyway: his
> >> shareware contains GPLed parts then, and I don't see how the user
> >> can modify, improve and distribute those parts while retaining a
> >> working executable.
> >
> > Uh. And what does "retaining a working executable" have to do with
> > users ability to modify, improve and distribute the GPL parts? Make
> > your own executable employing the modified GPL parts.
> 
> So you agree that the GPLed parts of the executable can't be modified,
> improved and distributed?  Fine, you get it.

Uh. Another GNUtian jumping to idiotic conclusions. How typical. 
Of course GPL'd parts of whatever can be modified improved and 
distributed. 

regards,
alexander.